Table 1 Revision of surgical liver volume parameters in 9 children
Surgical method | Volume | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLV(cm3) | FLV(cm3) | RLV1(cm3) | RLV2(cm3) | ΔRLV(cm3) | |
1 Surgery method (IV,V,VIII) | 485.4 | 250.3 | 113.6 | 157.8 | 44.2 |
410.5 | 300.6 | 203.1 | 274.9 | 71.8 | |
217.5 | 182.5 | 108.7 | 131.1 | 22.4 | |
2 Right hemicolectomy (V-VIII) | 494.1 | 233.9 | 87.6 | 102.3 | 14.7 |
372.5 | 201.4 | 118.4 | 160.7 | 42.3 | |
3 Enlarged righthemicolectomy (IV-VIII) | 452.3 | 220.7 | 102.5 | 146.4 | 43.9 |
412.5 | 170.2 | 96.5 | 120.6 | 24.1 | |
386.8 | 133.6 | 85.6 | 112.7 | 27.1 | |
4 Hepatic segment resection | 440.5 | 255.7 | 132.1 | 183.7 | 51.6 |
TLV Total liver volume, FLV Functional liver volume, RLV1 Residual liver volume after the first surgical planning of liver resection, RLV2 Residual volume of liver resected again after modification of surgical approach after prognostic evaluation of 3D images; ΔRLV = RLV2 - RLV1, increased residual liver volume | |||||