Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of radiologic outcomes between the two groups

From: Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

 

UBE-TLIF(n = 26)

MIS-TLIF(n = 28)

TLIF(n = 25)

p value

Disc height, mm

    

 Preoperative

8.92(1.78)

8.82(1.7)

8.08(1.32)

NS

 Last follow-up

10.92(1.81)

11.14(1.76)

10.36(1.8)

NS

 Difference

2(2.8)

2.32(2.75)

2.28(2.09)

NS

Lumbar lordosis,˚

    

 Preoperative

32.35(5.38)

30.75(6.25)

34.28(7.17)

NS

 Last follow-up

33.57(3.46)

33.07(3.5)

36.10(1.82)

NS

 Difference

1.21(4.8)

2.3(7.71)

1.82(5.3)

NS

Fusion (%)

23(88.5)

25(89.2)

23(92.0)

NS

Fusion grade

   

NS

 1

11

11

9

NS

 2

13

14

14

NS

 3

2

3

2

NS

 4

0

0

0

NS

  1. Values are presented as mean (SD) except for Fusion (%) and Fusion grade
  2. NS, not significant;
  3. Bridwell interbody fusion grading system: Grade I is defined as a fusion with remodeling and trabeculae present; Grade II is an intact graft with incomplete remodeling and no lucency present; Grade III is an intact graft with potential lucency at the cranial or caudal end; Grade IV is absent fusion with collapse/resorption of the graft