Skip to main content

Table 2 Postoperative pathology

From: The comparison of post-proximal gastrectomy digestive tract reconstruction methods

 

EG (n = 37)

JI (n = 29)

DTR (n = 28)

p-value

Tumor location

AEG

21(56.8)

18(62.1)

17(60.7)

0.899

Upper third of the stomach

16(43.2)

11(37.9)

11(39.3)

Tumor size (cm)

 

3.0(2.0–4.0)

1.7(1.3–3.1)

1.5(1.1–3.0)

0.279

Tumor differentiation

Well

5(13.5)

6(20.7)

5(17.8)

0.948

Moderately

17(45.9)

12(41.4)

11(39.3)

poorly

15(40.5)

11(37.9)

12(42.9)

Depth of gastric wall infiltration (cm)

 

1.51 ± 0.44

1.36 ± 0.67

1.56 ± 0.46

0.172

Number of lymph nodes cleared (pieces)

 

18.7 ± 9.96

18.9 ± 9.88

19.3 ± 9.56

0.113

TNM stage

IA

18(48.7)

19(65.5)

16(57.1)

 < 0.05

IB

5(13.5)

7(24.1)

8(28.6)

IIA

3(8.1)

3(10.4)

4(14.3)

IIB

7(18.9)

0

0

IIIA

3(8.1)

0

0

IIIB

1(2.7)

0

0

IIIC

0

0

0

Proximal margin(mm)

 

2.0(1.3–2.1)

2.0(1.2–2.8)

2.0(1.3–3.0)

0.073

Distal margin(mm)

 

5.0(2.2–6.0)

5.0(2.8–7.6)

5.0(2.6–7.4)

0.243

  1. The data demonstrated a significant difference in the TNM staging (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the proximal margin (p < 0.05) and distal margin among the three groups