Comparative analysis of the parapatellar and subpatellar approaches in reducing peripheral knee pain post-intramedullary tibial fracture surgery

Table 4 Comparison of knee lysholm scores at 12 months between the two groups

	Example number	Lameness	Squatting	Hanging lock	Instability	Swelling	Stair climbing	Crouching	Pain	Good rate
	Example number	Lameness	Squatting	Hanging lock	Instability	Swelling	Stair climbing	Crouching	Pain	sample	good people	center	difference
Test Group	13	4.85 ± 0.56	4.77 ± 0.83	14.62 ± 1.39	24.62 ± 1.39	9.38 ± 1.50	9.38 ± 1.50	4.69 ± 0.75	23.85 ± 3.00	9	4	0	0
Control Group	16	4.0 ± 1.03	4.81 ± 0.75	13.75 ± 2.24	22.19 ± 3.15	8.25 ± 2.05	7.63 ± 2.22	3.81 ± 1.28	20.94 ± 3.75	5	3	8	0
χ²		2.65	0.15	1.22	2.58	1.66	2.44	2.19	2.27	2.64
P		0.01	0.88	0.24	0.02	0.11	0.02	0.04	0.03	0.01

This table presents the Lysholm knee scores at 12 months postoperatively. The Lysholm score evaluates knee function based on several criteria, including pain, instability, and ability to perform daily activities. Higher scores indicate better knee function

ISSN: 1471-2482