Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the effectiveness and safety between the two groups

From: Comparative study of geometric localization technique and CT-guided percutaneous localization technique for peripheral GGO in wedge resection: a randomized controlled trial

Variables

GLT group (n = 228)

CPLT group (n = 227)

χ2 value

P value

Surgeons’ experience

  

0.656

0.418

> 10 and ≤ 20 years

146 (64.0%)

137 (60.4%)

  

> 20 years

82 (36.0%)

90 (39.6%)

  

Complications

  

114.251

 < 0.001

 Pneumothorax

0

19 (8.4%)

  

 Haemothorax

0

3 (1.3%)

 Intrapulmonary hemorrhage

0

13 (5.7%)

 Haemothorax and pneumothorax

0

3 (1.3%)

 Haemothorax and intrapulmonary hemorrhage

0

2 (0.9%)

  

Discomfort or pain at the punctured point

-

41 (14.6%)

-

-

Dislodgement or dislocation

-

14 (6.2%)

-

-

The success rate of localization

227 (99.6%)

214 (94.3%)

10.667

0.001

The rate of sufficient resection margin

227 (99.6%)

198 (87.2%)

28.110

 < 0.001

  1. GLT Geometric localization technique, CPLT CT-guided percutaneous localization technique