Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Comparative efficacy and safety of three surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a Bayesian-based network analysis

Study

Study type

Preoperative diagnosis

Surgical Intervention

Sample size

Mean age

(year)

Follow-up

(month)

Outcomes

Ryang 2008

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TMD

30

30

39.1

38.2

16

VAS, ODI, complications, OT, LHS, reoperation

Arts 2009

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TMD

159

166

41.6

41.3

13

VAS, ODI, complications, OT, LHS, reoperation

Franke 2009

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TMD

48

52

44.0

44.0

12

VAS, ODI, complications, OT, LHS, reoperation

Hermantin 1999

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TED

30

30

40.0

39.0

31

complications

Mayer 1993

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TED

20

20

39.8

42.7

24

complications, OT, reoperation

Ruetten 2008

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TED

87

91

39.0

39.0

24

VAS, ODI, complications, OT, reoperation

Gibson 2016

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TED

70

70

39.0

42.0

24

VAS, ODI, complications, OT, LHS, reoperation

Gadjradj 2022

RCT

Lumbar disc herniation

OMD

TED

309

179

45.7

45.3

12

VAS, ODI, OT, LOS, reoperation, complications

  1. OMD: open microdiscectomy; TMD: tubular microdiscectomy; TED: percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy; RCT: randomized controlled trial; VAS: visual analogue scale for back and/or leg pain; ODI: Oswestry disability index; OT: operative time; LHS: length of hospital stay