Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correction: Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis

BMC Surgery volume 23, Article number: 383 (2023) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 28 October 2023

Correction: BMC Surg 23; 1 (2023)

https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-023-02218-w

Following publication of the original article [1], there are some text change in the abstract section under Result the paragraph should need to change from “Result One hundred thirty-nine patients (58.4%) were performed by manual circular stapling, 99 patients (41.6%) by powerd circular stapling. Diverting stoma was performed in 45 cases (32.4%) by manual circular stapling, 42 patients (42.4%) by powerd circular stapling Postoperative complications were occurred clavien-dindo grade II or higher in 57 cases (23.9%) and grade III or higher in 20 cases (8.4%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 patients (5.9%) within all grades. After IPTW, the variables of patient characteristics was SMD ≤ 0.2 (Table 3), and there was a significant difference in anastomotic leakage (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% Confidence Interval(CI), 0.34–0.98; p = 0.041). In addition, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications in grade II or higher (OR, 0.88; 95%CI,0.65–1.19; p = 0.417) and grade III or higher (OR, 0.46; 95%CI, 0.29–0.74; p = 0.001) were significantly remarkable lower in powered circular stapling group.” to “ One hundred thirty-nine patients (58.4%) were performed by manual circular stapling, 99 patients (41.6%) by powerd circular stapling. Diverting stoma was performed in 45 cases (32.4%) by manual circular stapling, 42 patients (42.4%) by powerd circular stapling Postoperative complications were occurred clavien-dindo grade II or higher in 57 cases (23.9%) and grade III or higher in 20 cases (8.4%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 patients(5.9%) within all grades. After IPTW, the variables of patient characteristics was SMD ≤ 0.2 (Table 3),and there was a significant difference in anastomotic leakage (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.58; 95% Confidence Interval(CI), 0.34–0.98; p = 0.044). In addition, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications in grade II or higher (OR, 0.88; 95%CI, 0.65–1.18; p = 0.394) and grade III or higher (OR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.28–0.73; p = 0.001) were significantly remarkable lower in powered circular stapling group.”

In addition, there is a change in the Fig. 1 and the same has shown below:

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study

Full size image

The original article has been corrected.

Reference

  1. Matsuhashi N, et al. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis. BMC Surg. 2023;23:1. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-023-02218-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, 501-1194, Japan

    Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Jesse Yu Tajima, Ryoma Yokoi, Shigeru Kiyama, Masahide Endo, Yuta Sato, Masashi Kuno, Hirokatsu Hayashi, Ryuichi Asai, Masahiro Fukada, Itaru Yasufuku, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Naoki Okumura, Katsutoshi Murase & Takao Takahashi

  2. Innovative and Clinical Research Promotion Center, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, Japan

    Takuma Ishihara

Authors
  1. Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesse Yu Tajima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ryoma Yokoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shigeru Kiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masahide Endo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuta Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masashi Kuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hirokatsu Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ryuichi Asai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Masahiro Fukada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Itaru Yasufuku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yoshihiro Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Naoki Okumura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. Katsutoshi Murase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Takuma Ishihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  16. Takao Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuhisa Matsuhashi.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuhashi, N., Tajima, J.Y., Yokoi, R. et al. Correction: Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis. BMC Surg 23, 383 (2023). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-023-02278-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-023-02278-y

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us