Skip to main content

Surgical outcomes for patients with rectosigmoid hirschsprung disease who underwent transanal endorectal pull-through after 1 year of age

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the differences in postoperative complications and long-term bowel function outcomes between patients with rectosigmoid Hirschsprung disease (HD) who underwent transanal endorectal pull-through (TEPT) beyond infancy (age> 1 year of age) and those during infancy (≤ 1 year of age).

Methods

All patients with rectosigmoid HD at Beijing Children’s Hospital between January 2011 and December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups based on age at TEPT: group A was defined as patients who performed TEPT beyond infancy (age>1 year of age), and group B as patients who performed TEPT during infancy (age ≤ 1 year of age). Clinical details were collected from medical records. Bowel function outcomes were assessed by the Rintala questionnaire (age ≥ 4 years).

Results

A total of 339 patients were included: 216 (63.7%) who operated with TEPT beyond infancy (group A) and 123 (36.3%) during infancy (group B). Regarding postoperative complications, all patients suffering anastomosis leakage following TEPT (7/216, 3.2%) occurred in group A, and the rate of anastomosis leakage in group A was significantly higher than in group B (3.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.044). 228 patients (228/327, 69.7%) completed the Rintala questionnaire. There was no significant difference in long-term bowel function outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with patients who performed TEPT during infancy, those beyond infancy are more likely to suffer anastomosis leakage. however, the long-term bowel function outcomes seem comparable.

Type of Study

A retrospective single-center study.

Level of evidence

III.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Hirschsprung disease (HD) is characterized by the lack of ganglion in the submucosal and myenteric neural plexuses, requiring resection of the aganglionic segment as treatment [1]. With the heightened awareness of the disease and improvement in earlier diagnosis techniques, 80–90% of HD patients were diagnosed in the neonatal period in developed countries [2]. A survey of pediatric surgeons in Europe revealed that 87.5% of HD patients performed transanal endorectal pull-through (TEPT) before three months of age [3]. However, in developing countries, the majority of HD patients presented late to tertiary children’s hospitals due to the poor awareness of HD in primary hospitals and the general public [4, 5]. Unfortunately, the available literature on the surgical outcomes of patients who operated with TEPT beyond infancy is sparse, at best, and consists mainly of case reports [4, 6]. Ekenze et al. [4]suggested that the majority of HD patients after 1 year of age would require colostomy before radical surgery to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. However, Samir et al. [7] revealed that one-stage TEPT was feasible and safe for adolescents and adults, which could avoid the morbidity of a stoma. Due to this controversy and lack of understanding of the treatment and prognosis of TEPT in HD patients after 1 year of age, we conducted a retrospective study with the largest sample size in China to investigate the clinical features of HD patients beyond infancy and compare the difference in postoperative complications and long-term bowel function outcomes between HD patients beyond infancy and those during infancy. Given the limited research available in this area, this study is essential to provide insights into the treatment and prognosis for patients with rectosigmoid HD beyond infancy following TEPT.

2. Materials and methods

Ethical approval

This study adheres to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children’s Hospital (2021-E-132-R). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents.

Patient selection

Approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children’s Hospital, we reviewed the medical records of 339 consecutive patients with rectosigmoid HD who underwent TEPT at Beijing Children’s Hospital, National Center for Children’s Health, between January 2011 and December 2020. Patients who underwent radical surgery in other hospitals or patients without histopathological confirmation of HD were excluded. Patients diagnosed with Down syndrome or other identified genetic syndromes were excluded. All patients enrolled in our study underwent Soave pull-through by the same surgeon team.

Study design

The patient characteristics and clinical details were recorded retrospectively from medical records, including sex, gestational age, birth weight, congenital malformation, history of ostomy, age at TEPT, weight at TEPT, preoperative enterocolitis, surgical approach, and postoperative complications (anastomosis leakage, postoperative enterocolitis, and residual transitional zone). The choice of surgical approaches mainly depended on the extent of the lesion bowel and anastomotic tension. If the scope of the lesion bowel did not exceed the splenic flexure, we usually gave priority to performing total transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT). However, if preoperative angiography indicated the lesion bowel involved more than the splenic flexure or intraoperative mesenteric tension was too high, we often chose laparoscopic or laparotomy-assisted colonic mobilization (LERPT). All patients with rectosigmoid HD enrolled in our study were divided into two groups according to their age at TEPT: group A was defined as patients who performed TEPT beyond infancy (age>1 year of age), and group B as patients who performed TEPT during infancy (age ≤ 1 year of age) [4]. A comparative study was conducted to analyze the difference in postoperative complications and long-term bowel function outcomes between the two groups.

Bowel function outcomes were assessed by a bowel function score (BFS) questionnaire established by the 7-item scoring system with a maximum score of 20 [8]. Patients’ parents were systematically followed up by telephone and filled out the questionnaires. The BFS was only evaluated when patients were not less than 4 years old. Based on the total score of BFS, we divided them into three categories: ≥17 indicating good bowel function; 12–16 indicating moderate bowel function; <12 indicating poor bowel function. Soiling refers to fecal staining of underwear, fecal accidents to involuntary loss of feces needing a change of underwear or use of protective aids, and constipation is defined as the need for a special diet, laxatives, or enemas [8]. Enterocolitis was diagnosed when patients presented the typical clinical signs of bowel inflammation, such as abdominal distension, diarrhea, fever, or lethargy [9].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Statistics ver. 26.0 Software. Data were presented as frequency (percentage) for qualitative variables and median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. All the statistical tests were two-sided, with a significant level of p <0.05. Continuous Chi-squared tests or Fisher’s exact tests (Fisher’s exact if >25% of cells have expected counts less than 5)were applied for categorical variables. Independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test (Mann-Whitney if the data did not meet normal distribution) for continuous variables.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 339 patients were included in our study, including 216 patients in group A and 123 patients in group B. The baseline characteristics of all patients are presented in Table 1. Except for age at TEPT and weight at TEPT, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient demographics (age at TEPT, 36.0 [19.0. 63.0] vs. 7.0 [4.9, 9.0] months, p <0.001; age at weight, 14.0 [11.0, 18.0] vs. 7.5 [6.5, 9.0] kilograms, p<0.001). Eighteen patients (18/339, 5.3%) had congenital malformation: rectal perineal fistula (10/339, 2.9%), congenital heart malformation (5/339, 1.5%), spina bifida (3/339, 0.9%).

Table 1 Patient characteristics

Postoperative complications

Table 2 shows postoperative complications between the two groups. All patients were followed up for more than two years with a median follow-up time of 7.5 [5.5, 9.7] years, and there was no significant difference in the median follow-up time between the two groups (7.4 [5.1, 9.7] vs. 7.7 [5.8, 9.8] years, p = 0.261). Postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage, postoperative enterocolitis, and residual transitional zone. All patients who suffered anastomosis leakage following TEPT (7/216, 3.2%) occurred in group A, and the rate of anastomosis leakage in group A was significantly higher than in group B (3.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.044). No significant difference in the two groups was observed regarding postoperative enterocolitis and residual transitional zone (9.3% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.539; 0.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.357, respectively).

Table 2 Postoperative complications

Long-term bowel function outcomes

Twelve patients were excluded due to the follow-up age of less than 4 years old, and ninety-nine patients dropped out. Therefore, a total of 228 HD patients (median age 9.4 [6.8, 11.3] years) were included in the study of long-term bowel function outcomes with a response rate of 69.7% (228/327). A dropped-out analysis revealed the baseline characteristics were comparable between respondents and nonrespondents (Table 3). The results of bowel function outcomes were presented in Table 4. There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding the median follow-up interval (6.8 [4.7, 9.4] vs. 7.5 [5.6, 9.8] years, p = 0.238), while the median follow-up age in group A was significantly higher than group B (10.0 [8.1, 12.4] vs. 7.9 [6.0, 9.9] years, p < 0.001). No significant difference between the two groups was observed in terms of the ability to hold back defecation (p = 0.337), feeling to urge to defecate (p = 0.338), frequency of defecation (p = 0.526), soiling (p = 0.886), fecal accidents (p = 0.754), constipation (p = 0.422), and social problems (p = 0.409). As shown in Fig. 1, the median total bowel function score in group A was similar to group B (19 [16, 20] vs. 18 [14, 20], p = 0.308).

Table 3 Baseline characteristics of respondents and nonrespondents
Fig. 1
figure 1

Bowel function scores (BFS) between group A (n = 150) and group B (n = 78)

Table 4 Bowel function score (≥ 4 years old)

Discussion

This study represents the first attempt to compare the surgical outcomes between rectosigmoid HD patients who underwent TEPT beyond infancy and those who underwent the procedure during infancy. The key finding from this study is that patients who underwent TEPT beyond infancy are more susceptible to anastomosis leakage compared to those who had the procedure during infancy, however, the long-term bowel function outcomes seem comparable.

Based on the findings of our study, there is a significant difference in the age at TEPT compared to previous literature [10]. Our study found that over 60% of HD patients operated with TEPT beyond infancy, which is later than what has been reported in previous literature where more than 90% of patients received TEPT during infancy [4, 10]. This disparity can be attributed to two reasons. Firstly, HD patients included in our study aganglionosis limited to the rectosigmoid. As a result, many of them did not exhibit severe clinical symptoms and could be treated conservatively with glycerine enema at local hospitals [11]. Most of them would not be transferred to our center for radical surgery until presenting more severe symptoms [11]. This may also explain why the incidence of preoperative enterocolitis was relatively lower in our study than in most previous literature [12, 13]. Secondly, the delayed referral of HD patients from primary or secondary healthcare facilities to tertiary health facilities is responsible for the later age at radical surgery. This could be due to a lack of recognition of rectosigmoid HD by physicians from primary or secondary healthcare facilities [4, 5]. To address this issue, it is recommended that enlightenment programs be conducted for primary care physicians and public health education to shorten the diagnosis time of HD, enabling them to receive prompt and standardized treatment [4].

Regarding postoperative complications, the most striking difference between group A and group B was the rate of anastomosis leakage. All patients (7/216, 3.2%) who suffered anastomosis leakage occurred in patients operated TEPT beyond infancy. A plausible explanation for a higher anastomosis leakage rate in the older age group might be related to the problems of a severely dilated colon [6, 11, 14, 15]. Especially for patients with rectosigmoid HD, it could significantly contribute to the difficulty in dissection above the dentate line when performing TEPT [11]. Furthermore, older patients who performed TEPT tend to have a deeper pelvis and more abundant mesenteric blood vessels, making the dissection more difficult. These factors might eventually result in a hemodynamic disorder of anastomosis, leading to a high incidence of anastomosis leakage [6, 15]. To reduce the incidence of anastomosis leakage, some scholars recommend that HD patients beyond infancy require a stoma before radical surgery to decompress the distal colon [4, 6, 16]. However, specific stoma has many complications, such as prolapse, stenosis, and wound infection [17]. The requirement of multiple admissions and operations also placed a heavy burden on families and the medical system [7, 17]. Therefore, the desire to avoid stroma creation and adopt one-stage TEPT was established. In our study, all the patients beyond infancy performed one-stage TEPT when the general condition was permitted. However, the incidence of postoperative anastomosis leakage in the older age group was much lower than in previous literature [4, 6]. The possible reason might be as follows. On the one hand, we routinely perform careful bowel preparation before radical surgery to reduce the tension of the distal colon [7, 18]. The duration of bowel preparation depended on the degree of fecal impaction and the effectiveness of bowel irrigation. Most patients routinely underwent bowel irrigations for 1–2 weeks before radical surgery. However, some HD patients who performed TEPT beyond infancy might have longer bowel preparation due to fecal impaction and severe bowel dilation. On the other hand, we are prone to remove all the lesion bowel (including spasm segment, transitional and proximal dilated zones) to make the proximal pull-through bowel normal in terms of pathology and morphology, leading to a good coloanal anastomosis [19]. Based on our experience, despite of higher incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage in HD patients beyond infancy, the one-stage operation is feasible for them if patients are in good condition [7]. However, it was still recommended that radical surgery should be performed during infancy to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications [6].

Our study found that long-term bowel function outcomes of HD patients who performed TEPT beyond infancy were comparable to those who underwent the procedure during infancy. Considering the discrepancy in the follow-up age, further research needs to confirm it. In addition, the long-term bowel function outcomes were also affected by other factors, such as the level of anastomosis above the dentate line, motility of the remnant ganglionic colon, and the integrity of the anal sphincter [20, 21]. Scholars generally believed that damage to the anal sphincter and too low anastomosis could lead to fecal incontinence [8, 22]. In our center, the TEPT procedure started rectal mucosectomy from 0.5 to 1 cm proximal to the dentate line, ensuring the integrity of the dentate line [23].

The study has some limitations. Firstly, despite the comparable baseline characteristics of respondents and nonrespondents, it remains unknown whether the postoperative bowel function differed in those who responded and those who did not, which might result in potential selection bias. Secondly, the median follow-up age in group A was significantly higher than in group B, which could result in certain deviations in long-term bowel function outcomes. Thirdly, our study is retrospective and single-center, leading to a particular deviation.

To conclude, the study found that rectosigmoid HD patients who underwent TEPT beyond are more likely to suffer anastomosis leakage. However, the long-term bowel function outcomes seem comparable and further investigation is required.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Davidson JR, Kyrklund K, Eaton S, Pakarinen MP, Thompson DS, Cross K, et al. Long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes of Hirschsprung Disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56:1502–11. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.01.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wulkan ML, Lee H. Minimally Invasive Neonatal Surgery. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44:xix. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.clp.2017.09.002

  3. Bradnock TJ, Walker GM. Evolution in the management of Hirschsprung’s disease in the UK and Ireland: a national survey of practice revisited. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(1):34–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1308/003588410X12771863936846.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekenze SO, Ngaikedi C, Obasi AA. Problems and outcome of Hirschsprung’s disease presenting after 1 year of age in a developing country. World J Surg. 2011;35(1):22–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00268-010-0828-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poenaru D, Borgstein E, Numanoglu A, Azzie G. Caring for children with colorectal disease in the context of limited resources. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(2):118–27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2009.11.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stensrud KJ, Emblem R, Bjørnland K. Late diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease–patient characteristics and results. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(10):1874–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.04.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ammar SA, Ibrahim IA. One-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease in adolescents and adults. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(12):2246–450. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11605-011-1662-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuvonen MI, Kyrklund K, Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. Bowel function and quality of Life after Transanal Endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung Disease: controlled outcomes up to Adulthood. Ann Surg. 2017;265(3):622–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roorda D, Oosterlaan J, van Heurn E, Derikx JPM. Risk factors for enterocolitis in patients with Hirschsprung disease: a retrospective observational study. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(10):1791–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.04.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Westfal ML, Okiemy O, Chung PHY, Feng J, Lu C, Miyano G, et al. Optimal timing for Soave primary pull-through in short-segment Hirschsprung disease: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(4):719–25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xie C, Yan J, Guo J, Liu Y, Chen Y. Comparison of clinical features and prognosis between ultrashort-segment and short-segment hirschsprung disease. Front Pediatr. 2023;10:1061064. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fped.2022.1061064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Svetanoff WJ, Dekonenko C, Osuchukwu O, Oyetunji TA, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, et al. Inpatient management of Hirschsprung’s associated enterocolitis treatment: the benefits of standardized care. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020;36(12):1413–21. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00383-020-04747-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pruitt LCC, Skarda DE, Rollins MD, Bucher BT. Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis in children treated at US children’s hospitals. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;55(3):535–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.10.060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elhalaby EA, Hashish A, Elbarbary MM, Soliman HA, Wishahy MK, Elkholy A, et al. Transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: a multicenter study. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):345–51. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Podevin G, Lardy H, Azzis O, Branchereau S, Petit T, Sfeir R, et al. Technical problems and complications of a transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006;16(2):104–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1055/s-2006-923995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee CC, Lien R, Chiang MC, et al. Clinical impacts of delayed diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s Disease in Newborn infants. Pediatr Neonatol. 2012;53(2):133–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langer JC, Durrant AC, de la Torre L, Teitelbaum DH, Minkes RK, Caty MG, et al. One-stage transanal Soave pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease: a multicenter experience with 141 children. Ann Surg. 2003;238(4):569–83. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/01.sla.0000089854.00436.cd.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gause CD, Krishnaswami S. Management of Anorectal malformations and Hirschsprung Disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2022;102(5):695–714. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.suc.2022.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Austin KM. The pathogenesis of Hirschsprung’s disease-associated enterocolitis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2012;21(4):319–27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karlsen RA, Hoel AT, Fosby MV, Ertresvåg K, Austrheim AI, Stensrud KJ, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes after total transanal and laparoscopic assisted endorectal pull-through in patients with rectosigmoid Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(9):69–74. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyano G, Takeda M, Koga H, Okawada M, Nakazawa-Tanaka N, Ishii J, et al. Hirschsprung’s disease in the laparoscopic transanal pull-through era: implications of age at surgery and technical aspects. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018;34(2):183–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00383-017-4187-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pakarinen M. Perioperative complications of Transanal pull-through surgery for Hirschsprung’s Disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018;28(2):152–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1055/s-0038-1632393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyrklund K, Sloots C, de Blaauw I, et al. ERNICA guidelines for the management of rectosigmoid Hirschsprung’s disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):164. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13023-020-01362-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Chuanping Xie thanks his parents for always accompanying him to grow up.

Funding

No source of funding for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors read and confirmed the final manuscript. Chuanping Xie, Jiayu Yan, Kexin Wang participated in the data collection, data analysis, and drafting of the article; Chuanping Xie and Kexin Wang contributed to the data collection; Jiayu Yan, Wenbo Pang, Dan Zhang, and Kai Wang contributed to revising the article. Yajun Chen was the major surgeon who conducted the surgery and contributed to reviewing and drafting the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yajun Chen.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Financial support statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, C., Yan, J., Wang, K. et al. Surgical outcomes for patients with rectosigmoid hirschsprung disease who underwent transanal endorectal pull-through after 1 year of age. BMC Surg 24, 273 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-024-02560-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-024-02560-7

Keywords