Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt therapy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Abstract

Background

Limited data are available regarding the long-term functional outcomes and associated factors in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) undergoing ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes of iNPH patients treated with VPS.

Methods

Functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year intervals postoperatively using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), the iNPH grading scale (iNPHGS), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Results

Significant improvements were observed in mRS and iNPHGS scores at 1, 2, and 3 years post-surgery compared to the baseline level. MMSE scores showed significant improvement at 1-year and 3-year follow-ups. Multivariate regression analysis identified key factors influencing changes in mRS scores: postoperative complications and education level at 1 year, postoperative complications at 2 years, and sex, education level, postoperative complications, and smoking at 3 years. For iNPHGS scores, significant factors included sex, age at surgery, and smoking at 1 and 2 years. Changes in MMSE scores were associated with sex and the duration of preoperative symptoms at 1 year, and postoperative complications, education level, and smoking at 3 years.

Conclusion

This study affirmed the efficacy and safety of VPS in managing iNPH. Factors influencing postoperative outcomes predominantly included education level, smoking, duration of preoperative symptoms, and postoperative complications. However, further research is required to validate these findings.

Peer Review reports

Background

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a progressive yet potentially treatable neurological disorder predominantly affecting the elderly, with an estimated prevalence of 3.7% among individuals aged 65 years and older [1]. The prevalence markedly increases in those aged 80 years and above [1, 2]. Clinically, iNPH is defined by a triad of hallmark symptoms: gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary dysfunction, typically accompanied by ventricular enlargement and normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure as evidenced by brain imaging [3,4,5].

CSF shunting is the cornerstone of iNPH management, offering significant improvements in symptoms and prognosis. Among the surgical options, ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is the most commonly employed, while ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) and lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) are less frequently utilized [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Despite its efficacy, shunt surgery carries a risk of complications, including mechanical malfunctions, infections, and over-drainage [13,14,15,16,17]. VPS remains the preferred treatment modality for iNPH in Western countries [18, 19]. However, complication rates associated with VPS vary widely, with common issues including intracerebral hemorrhage, seizures, infections, over-drainage, and shunt obstruction [8, 13, 17, 20, 21]. Notably, limited studies have specifically investigated VPS-related complications in the Chinese population, highlighting a gap in the literature [20, 21].

Regular clinical follow-up after shunt surgery serves a dual purpose: managing potential complications and assessing the efficacy of treatment. However, studies investigating the outcomes and prognostic factors of shunt surgery have produced inconsistent findings. These discrepancies are attributed to differences in outcome measures, diagnostic criteria, follow-up durations, postoperative management strategies, and the types of shunt systems employed [14]. For example, Israelsson H et al. [22] and Petersen J et al. [23] have reported enhanced quality of life within 6 to 45 months post-surgery. In contrast, Junkkari A et al. [24] have observed a decline in long-term quality of life due to disease progression and comorbid conditions. Similarly, Yamada S et al. [25] have noted that symptoms can worsen several years after surgery, despite initial improvements achieved through optimal valve pressure adjustments following VPS.

Research on the long-term prognosis of iNPH patients post-VPS remains limited, with most studies restricted to follow-up periods of approximately 1 year. Furthermore, evaluations of long-term cognitive outcomes are even scarcer. This study sought to address this gap by investigating the extended functional outcomes and associated factors in iNPH patients treated with VPS within the Chinese population.

Methods

Study subjects

This study included patients diagnosed with iNPH who underwent VPS placement. All participants were of Chinese Han ethnicity and were selected from Southwest Hospital. The diagnosis of iNPH was established based on clinical manifestations, physical examinations, brain imaging findings, and the results of experimental diagnostic tests, following the Japanese guidelines (Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Second Edition) [3]. Patients underwent VPS using an identical programmable valve system with uniform settings. Surgical procedures were performed by the same medical team, utilizing Codman Johnson CSF shunts and accessories (826653). The initial intraoperative pressure was set at 10-mm Hâ‚‚O lower than the preoperative lumbar puncture pressure and subsequently adjusted during follow-up visits based on clinical improvements.

The inclusion criteria for the study required participants to meet the clinical diagnosis of iNPH, which was defined by the presence of at least one of the three cardinal iNPH symptoms, ventriculomegaly with an Evans index > 0.3, and an intracranial pressure (ICP) ≤ 200 mm H₂O as determined by a spinal tap test (STT) with normal CSF analysis (routine and biochemical). Additionally, participants needed to demonstrate symptom improvement in at least one of the following scenarios: after a CSF drainage test, following continuous CSF drainage, or post-shunting surgery. The exclusion criteria ruled out individuals with secondary causes of ventricular enlargement or other neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and cerebrovascular conditions.

Study design

This study employed an observational, retrospective, long-term follow-up design, leveraging 13 years of comprehensive follow-up data collected at our hospital. Based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 44 patients were enrolled between March 2012 and May 2022. Each participant underwent standardized clinical evaluations conducted by the same team of trained physicians both preoperatively and at 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. During follow-up visits, valve pressure settings were monitored and adjusted as necessary to address any deviations. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Clinical assessment

Patient outcomes were evaluated using three standardized scales throughout the follow-up period. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assessed daily living abilities, the iNPH Grading Scale (iNPHGS) measured symptom severity [26], and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) evaluated overall cognitive function. Preoperative assessments served as baseline benchmarks for monitoring postoperative improvements and progression over time.

Data collection

Data collection spanned from the preoperative period to June 2023. For each participant, demographic characteristics and clinical assessment outcomes were systematically recorded. Demographic data included sex, age at the time of surgery, education level (categorized as illiterate, primary school, secondary school, and university or above), duration of preoperative disease, history of comorbidities (hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes), and unhealthy lifestyle habits (smoking and alcohol consumption history). Clinical assessment outcomes were determined by calculating the difference between postoperative and preoperative scores across the three assessment scales. The primary outcome measures were defined as the difference in scores between the baseline and each follow-up period, reflecting clinical improvement. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications and mortality.

Statistical analysis

The Shapiro–Wilk test was utilized to assess the distribution of continuous variables. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD) or median with interquartile range [M (IQR)], depending on the distribution. Categorical data were summarized as rates [n (%)]. Differences between two dependent samples were analyzed using the paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. Friedman ANOVA was employed to measure repeated outcomes across the follow-up period. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to examine the impact of variables, including sex, age at the time of surgery, education level, duration of preoperative disease, comorbidities (hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes), and lifestyle factors (smoking and alcohol consumption), on clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20, with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Between March 2012 and May 2022, 44 patients diagnosed with iNPH underwent VPS treatment. The cohort included 24 men (54.55%) and 20 women (45.45%), with a mean age at admission of 64.73 ± 7.12 years. The median duration of preoperative disease was 24 months (IQR: 12–24 months). Table 1 provides an overview of the baseline characteristics of the study population.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study subjects

As of June 2023, all 44 patients completed both preoperative assessments and clinical evaluations at the 12-month postoperative mark. A total of 31 patients (70.45%) completed follow-up assessments at 24 months, while 25 patients (56.82%) completed assessments at 36 months. The follow-up trajectory of the participants is depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study subjects

Clinical outcomes

Complications: Postoperative complications were observed in seven patients (15.91%). Five patients experienced overdrainage, while two cases of infection and shunt blockage were reported, respectively.

Mortality

By the study endpoint, five patients had died during follow-up periods of 19, 25, 38, 40, and 62 months, resulting in an overall mortality rate of 11.40%. The causes of death included pneumonia, kidney failure, and Alzheimer’s disease in three patients, and cardiovascular disease in two patients. The median follow-up duration for surviving patients was 49 months (IQR: 20.5–77.0 months).

Abilities of daily living

Measured by the mRS, the proportion of patients achieving a favorable outcome, defined as an improvement of at least 1 point in mRS score, was 61.40% (95% CI: 46.40–76.30%) at 1 year, 48.39% (95% CI: 23.10–64.90%) at 2 years, and 44.00% (95% CI: 23.10–64.90%) at 3 years postoperatively.

Symptom severity

Based on the iNPHGS, the proportion of patients demonstrating a favorable outcome, defined as an improvement of at least 1 point in iNPHGS score, was 95.45% (95% CI: 89.00–101.90%) at 1 year, 80.65% (95% CI: 65.90–95.40%) at 2 years, and 76.00% (95% CI: 58.00–94.00%) at 3 years postoperatively.

Overall cognitive function

Using the MMSE, the rate of improvement in overall cognitive function, defined as an increase of at least 1 point in MMSE score, was 52.30% (95% CI: 36.90–67.60%) at 1 year, 35.48% (95% CI: 17.60–53.30%) at 2 years, and 16.00% (95% CI: 0.60–31.40%) at 3 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes are detailed in Table 2.

Table 2 Clinical outcomes of patients

Comparison of functional improvement

At 12 months postoperatively, patients demonstrated a significant improvement in their abilities of daily living compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.001). This improvement persisted at 24 months (P < 0.05) and 36 months (P < 0.05) postoperatively, reflecting sustained benefits over time. Symptom severity, as measured by the iNPHGS, showed substantial and enduring alleviation across all follow-up periods compared to baseline (all P < 0.001). At the 12-month mark, symptom severity significantly decreased (P < 0.001) relative to preoperative scores. This trend of significant alleviation continued at 24 months (P < 0.001) and 36 months (P < 0.001), indicating consistent symptom relief over the study duration. In terms of cognitive function, as assessed by the MMSE, patients exhibited a notable improvement at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared to their preoperative scores. However, a slight decline in cognitive function was observed at 24 months, though it did not reach statistical significance relative to the postoperative status (P > 0.05). By 36 months, a significant reduction in cognitive function was evident compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.05). Table 3 provides a detailed summary of the comparisons in functional improvement before and after surgery.

Table 3 Comparison of functional improvement of patients pre- and postoperatively

Over the entire follow-up period, only 25 of the 44 patients completed all three postoperative clinical assessments. Repeated measurement comparisons revealed statistically significant differences across the four clinical evaluation time points (P < 0.05). However, not all pairwise comparisons demonstrated statistical significance. The statistically significant differences are provided in Table 4.

Table 4 Comparison of functional improvement of patients over the follow-up period

Significant improvements were observed in the abilities of daily living when comparing 12 months post-surgery to both pre-surgery scores and 36 months post-surgery.

For symptom severity, pre-surgery scores were significantly worse than those recorded at 12, 24, and 36 months post-surgery. Additionally, outcomes at 12 months post-surgery were significantly better than those at 36 months, reflecting a gradual decline over time.

Regarding overall cognitive function, scores at 12 months post-surgery were significantly better than those at 36 months, indicating a notable decline in cognitive performance over the long term.

Factors influencing clinical outcomes

Postoperative complications were strongly associated with variations in pre- and postoperative mRS scores, indicating reduced responsiveness to shunt treatment. Interestingly, education level exhibited a dual impact on daily living abilities: higher education was positively correlated with reduced daily functioning 12 months post-surgery, yet inversely associated with functional decline at 36 months post-surgery. Additionally, the duration of preoperative illness and smoking emerged as significant negative predictors of daily living abilities 36 months post-surgery, suggesting that a longer disease history corresponded to greater functional impairment. Further details regarding the factors influencing pre- and postoperative differences in daily living abilities are provided in Table 5.

Table 5 Factors associated with abilities of daily living of patients after surgery

Regarding iNPHGS scores, smoking was identified as a significant negative factor influencing the differences between preoperative and postoperative measurements at both 12 and 24 months (Table 5). Age at the time of surgery was also negatively correlated with symptom severity, indicating that older patients tended to experience more pronounced symptoms at 12 months post-surgery. Additional factors impacting the severity of symptoms are outlined in Table 6.

Table 6 Factors associated with the severity of symptoms of patients after surgery

The duration of preoperative illness significantly exacerbated the differences in MMSE scores between pre- and 12-month postoperative assessments, highlighting its detrimental effect on cognitive function. Postoperative complications and smoking were further implicated in accelerating cognitive decline at 36 months post-surgery. Other factors influencing overall cognitive function are summarized in Table 7.

Table 7 Factors associated with the overall cognitive function of patients after surgery

Discussion

A standardized follow-up protocol is critically needed, not only to evaluate the efficacy of shunting but also to gain deeper insights into disease progression and identify strategies to delay its advancement. Despite its importance, no universally accepted follow-up protocol currently exists. In this study, we employed three commonly used and readily accessible clinical scales to assess the outcomes of VPS treatment. These scales, also integral to preoperative evaluations, enhance their utility for continuous follow-up and longitudinal monitoring.

VPS treatment is widely recognized as beneficial for patients with iNPH. For instance, David Krahulik et al. have observed a statistically significant improvement in MMSE scores following VPS treatment within a 6-month follow-up period [8]. Similarly, a 1-year follow-up study has reported favorable outcomes in 69% of patients based on mRS scores and in 77% of patients based on iNPHGS scores [14]. Furthermore, a comprehensive meta-analysis on VPS efficacy has revealed that more than 75% of patients experience overall improvement post-treatment, with notable gains in gait (72%), cognitive function (61%), and urinary control (54%) [27]. Abdul Malik Popal et al. have also demonstrated that 58% of patients have achieved independent living (mRS 0–2) at 2 years post-surgery [28].

In our study, the results aligned closely with those documented in the literature, further corroborating the benefits of VPS. We found that 61.40% of patients exhibited marked improvements in daily living abilities at 1 year post-surgery, decreasing to 48.39% at 2 years and 44.00% at 3 years. Symptom improvement was observed in 95.45% of patients at 1 year, 80.65% at 2 years, and 76.00% at 3 years. Cognitive function improvements were noted in 52.30% of patients at 1 year, 35.48% at 2 years, and 16.00% at 3 years. These findings underscored the enduring, albeit declining, benefits of VPS treatment over time, affirming its role as an effective therapeutic intervention for iNPH.

Using the iNPHGS, symptoms at all three follow-up points demonstrated significant improvement compared to baseline. However, symptoms at the final follow-up showed greater deterioration relative to the first follow-up. This aligned with a previous study that has reported a statistically significant decline in the 10-meter walk test for VPS patients at the 6-month follow-up [8]. In contrast, a long-term follow-up study spanning at least 10 years has found substantial and sustained improvements across all symptoms compared to baseline, as measured by the Japanese Scale for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus [9]. These varying outcomes may be attributed to differences in follow-up duration, diagnostic protocols, selection criteria, and the use of diverse outcome measures.

Regarding daily living abilities, the mRS score at 1 year post-surgery was significantly lower than preoperative levels, based on both the 25- and 44-patient samples. Similarly, prior research has demonstrated a significant increase in the proportion of patients able to live independently (mRS scores of 0–2), rising from 53% pre-surgery to 82% at 12 months post-surgery [29]. However, the mRS score differences between pre-operation and the last two follow-up points were statistically significant only when the preoperative population consisted of 44 patients. When the preoperative sample was limited to 25 patients, the differences were not statistically significant.

In terms of cognitive function, MMSE scores for the 44-patient cohort differed significantly between pre-operation and both 1-year and 3-year follow-ups, although no significant difference was observed at 2 years post-surgery. Conversely, when comparing MMSE scores among four groups within the 25-patient cohort, no significant differences were noted except between the 1-year and 3-year follow-ups. These discrepancies might stem from variations in sample size and characteristics, highlighting the influence of these factors on statistical outcomes.

Notably, both mRS and MMSE scores at the 3-year follow-up were significantly worse than those at the 1-year follow-up, reflecting a decline in daily living abilities and cognitive function over time. This deterioration was likely attributable to aging and the progressive nature of the disease [30,31,32,33]. Our findings align with previous research. For instance, one study has reported that 83% of patients show clinical improvement at the 1-year follow-up, decreasing to 62% at mid-term follow-up and 38% at late follow-up [34]. Another study has observed a moderate decline in gait performance over time, from 91% at 3 months to 75% at 3 years, while memory improvements are sustained at 80% throughout the same period [35]. These results underscore the critical importance of integrating long-term symptom monitoring into postoperative management to enhance patients’ quality of life and alleviate the burden on caregivers.

Our study also highlighted several significant negative factors affecting postoperative outcomes, including the duration of preoperative illness, smoking, age at surgery, and postoperative complications. These factors were associated with poorer daily living abilities, increased symptom severity, and diminished cognitive function after surgery. These findings emphasized the value of early surgical intervention, smoking cessation, and strategies to minimize surgical complications in improving overall patient outcomes. Proactive management of these factors may play a pivotal role in enhancing postoperative health and recovery.

In recent years, considerable attention has been devoted to identifying the risk factors influencing shunting outcomes in patients with iNPH. This study primarily focused on the background risk factors associated with VPS in iNPH. Regarding daily living abilities, postoperative complications were identified as a significant negative factor influencing the difference in mRS scores from pre-surgery at all follow-up intervals (1, 2, and 3 years post-surgery). Interestingly, this contrasted with findings by Andren, K. et al., who have reported no adverse impact of complications on long-term mRS outcomes in iNPH patients [36].

For symptom severity, age at the time of surgery emerged as a significant adverse factor influencing iNPHGS score differences at 1 year post-surgery, consistent with previous studies [37, 38]. However, Kimura, T. et al. have found no significant correlation between age and the degree of postoperative improvement following VPS or LPS, highlighting discrepancies in the literature [39].

In terms of cognitive function, our study revealed that the duration of preoperative disease positively impacted MMSE scores at 1 year post-surgery. This finding contrasted with previous research [28, 40, 41], which have demonstrated that a longer duration from iNPH onset to surgery is significantly associated with poorer shunt responsiveness in MMSE outcomes.

The variability in reported risk factors likely stemmed from differences in patient selection criteria and follow-up intervals among studies. These discrepancies underscored the need for accumulating more long-term clinical data to enable comprehensive analysis and more robust conclusions regarding the risk factors affecting shunting outcomes in iNPH.

Conclusions

This study reaffirmed the efficacy and safety of VPS as a treatment for iNPH. Key factors influencing postoperative outcomes included education level, smoking status, disease duration, and postoperative complications. However, further research is necessary to validate these findings and deepen our understanding of their impact.

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

iNPH:

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

CSF:

cerebrospinal fluid

VPS:

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

VAS:

ventriculoatrial shunt

LPS:

lumboperitoneal shunt

ICP:

intracranial pressure

STT:

spinal tap test

mRS:

modified Rankin Scale

INPHGS:

INPH Grading scale

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Examination

M (IQR):

median with interquartile rang

References

  1. Andersson J, Rosell M, Kockum K, Lilja-Lund O, Soderstrom L, Laurell K. Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A prospective, population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0217705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaraj D, Rabiei K, Marlow T, Jensen C, Skoog I, Wikkelso C. Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology. 2014;82(16):1449–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, Kazui H, Miyake H, Miyajima M, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2012;52(11):775–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, Ishii K, Kuriyama N, Kazui H, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (Third Edition): Endorsed by the Japanese Society of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2021;61(2):63–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(3 Suppl):S4–16. discussion ii-v.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazui H, Miyajima M, Mori E, Ishikawa M, Investigators S-. Lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (SINPHONI-2): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(6):585–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toma AK, Papadopoulos MC, Stapleton S, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD. Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155(10):1977–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krahulik D, Vaverka M, Hrabalek L, Hampl M, Halaj M, Jablonsky J, et al. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt in treating of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-single-center study. Acta Neurochir. 2020;162(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grasso G, Torregrossa F, Leone L, Frisella A, Landi A. Long-Term efficacy of shunt therapy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:E458–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu J-T, Su P-H. The efficacy and limitation of lumboperitoneal shunt in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;193:105748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Todisco M, Picascia M, Pisano P, Zangaglia R, Minafra B, Vitali P, et al. Lumboperitoneal shunt in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective controlled study. J Neurol. 2020;267(9):2556–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andren K, Wikkelso C, Hellstrom P, Tullberg M, Jaraj D. Early shunt surgery improves survival in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(4):1153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hung AL, Vivas-Buitrago T, Adam A, Lu J, Robison J, Elder BD, et al. Ventriculoatrial versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;157:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyajima M, Kazui H, Mori E, Ishikawa M, Investigators S-. One-year outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of lumboperitoneal shunt to ventriculoperitoneal shunt. J Neurosurg. 2016;125(6):1483–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Merkler AE, Ch’ang J, Parker WE, Murthy SB, Kamel H. The rate of complications after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:654–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Duthel R, Nuti C, MotuoFotso MJ, Beauchesne P, Brunon J. Complications of lumboperitoneal shunts. Retrospective study of 195 patients (214 procedures). Neurochirurgie. 1996;42(2):83–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feletti A, d’Avella D, Wikkelso C, Klinge P, Hellstrom P. European i NPHMSG. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in the European idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus multicenter study. Operative Neurosurg. 2019;17(1):97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvi MA, Brown D, Yolcu Y, Zreik J, Javeed S, Bydon M, et al. Prevalence and trends in management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in the united States: insights from the National inpatient sample. World Neurosurg. 2021;145:E38–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Oliveira MF, Reis RC, Trindade EM, Gomes Pinto FC. Evidences in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2015;61(3):258–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu Z, Cai C, Zheng Z, Jiang H, Fu W, Yu Q, et al. Long-term efficacy of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patient with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Chin J Neurosurg. 2019;35(2):140–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xie D, Chen H, Guo X, Liu Y. Comparative study of lumboperitoneal shunt and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Translational Res. 2021;13(10):11917–24.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Israelsson H, Eklund A, Malm J. Cerebrospinal fluid shunting improves Long-Term quality of life in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(4):574–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petersen J, Hellstrom P, Wikkelso C, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Improvement in social function and health-related quality of life after shunt surgery for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(4):776–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Junkkari A, Sintonen H, Danner N, Jyrkkanen HK, Rauramaa T, Luikku AJ, et al. 5-Year health-related quality of life outcome in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol. 2021;268(9):3283–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Nakajima M, Nozaki K. Reconsidering ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery and postoperative shunt valve pressure adjustment: our approaches learned from past challenges and failures. Front Neurol. 2022;12:798488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kubo Y, Kazui H, Yoshida T, Kito Y, Kimura N, Tokunaga H, et al. Validation of grading scale for evaluating symptoms of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(1):37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Giordan E, Palandri G, Lanzino G, Murad MH, Elder BD. Outcomes and complications of different surgical treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(4):1024–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Popal AM, Zhu Z, Guo X, Zheng Z, Cai C, Jiang H, et al. Outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic Normal-Pressure hydrocephalus 2 years after surgery. Front Surg. 2021;8:641561.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Klinge P, Hellstrom P, Tans J, Wikkelso C, European i NPHMSG. One-year outcome in the European multicentre study on iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;126(3):145–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Toma AK, Stapleton S, Papadopoulos MC, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD. Natural history of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev. 2011;34(4):433–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarnaris A, Williams MA. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: update and practical approach on diagnosis and management. Neurosurg Q. 2011;21(1):72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Picascia M, Minafra B, Zangaglia R, Gracardi L, Pozzi NG, Sinforiani E, et al. Spectrum of cognitive disorders in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Funct Neurol. 2016;31(3):143–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jaraj D, Wikkelso C, Rabiei K, Marlow T, Jensen C, Ostling S, et al. Mortality and risk of dementia in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: A population study. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(8):850–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. de Oliveira MF, Sorte AAB Jr., Emerenciano DL, Rotta JM, Mendes GAS, Pinto FCG. Long term follow-up of shunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: a single center experience. Acta Neurol Belgica. 2021;121(6):1799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Aygok G, Marmarou A, Young HF, editors. Three-year outcome of shunted idiopathic NPH patients. 12th International Symposium on Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring; 2005 Aug 16–21; Hong Kong, PEOPLES R CHINA.

  36. Andren K, Wikkelso C, Sundstrom N, Agerskov S, Israelsson H, Laurell K, et al. Long-term effects of complications and vascular comorbidity in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a quality registry study. J Neurol. 2018;265(1):178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kazui H, Mori E, Ohkawa S, Okada T, Kondo T, Sakakibara R, et al. Predictors of the disappearance of triad symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery. J Neurol Sci. 2013;328(1–2):64–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Badagard H, Braun M, Nilsson D, Stridh L, Virhammar J. Negative predictors of shunt surgery outcome in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;141(3):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kimura T, Yamada S, Sugimura T, Seki T, Miyano M, Fukuda S, et al. Preoperative predictive factors of Short-Term outcome in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg. 2021;151:E399–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Uchigami H, Sato K, Samejima N, Watanabe A, Kuwana N, Tsuchida T, et al. Preoperative factors associated with shunt responsiveness in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022;222:107425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vakili S, Moran D, Hung A, Elder BD, Jeon L, Fialho H, et al. Timing of surgical treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: association between treatment delay and reduced short-term benefit. NeuroSurg Focus. 2016;41(3):E2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was supported by Chongqing Medical Scientific Research Project (2020FYYX201 to Jingyu Chen).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

As the first author, Jingyu Chen contributed to research design, manuscript drafting, and revisions for important intellectual content and data analysis. Jishu Xian as the co-first author, conducted the work of data collection and analysis and manuscript drafting. Feilong Wang, Chenghai Zuo and Li Wei actively enrolled patients in the study. As corresponding authors, Hua Feng, Rong Hu, and Zhi Chen contributed to initiative concept, research design, manuscript revisions, and final manuscript approval. All authors had access to the data, significantly contributed to the article, agreed to submit it for publication, and vouched for the integrity, accuracy, and completeness of the data and the fidelity of the trial to the protocol. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingyu Chen.

Ethics declarations

Human Ethics and Consent to Participate

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The institutional ethics committee of Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University approved this study (No. (B)KY2023027). Informed consents were signed by each subject.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Xian, J., Wang, F. et al. Long-term outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt therapy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. BMC Surg 25, 157 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-025-02895-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12893-025-02895-9

Keywords